1 | Course Title: | SOCIOLOGY OF THE ISLAMIC LAW |
2 | Course Code: | TIB6162 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | Third Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 2 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 6 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Doç. Dr. M.SALİH KUMAŞ |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Prof. Dr. Ali KAYA, Prof. Dr. H. İbrahim ACAR, Doç. Dr. Abdurrahim KOZALI, Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Eren GÜNDÜZ |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi M. Salih KUMAŞ msalihkumas@uluda.edu.tr 0 533 331 43 80 Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi-60 289 |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | To reveal the vital role of fiqh as a social institution in the determination of religion-society relations in the past and to determine its value in terms of today. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | Benefiting from the possibilities and opportunities of the sociological perspective in studies in the field of Islamic law |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Relationship between law and sociology | |
2 | The emergence of sociology of law and its basic theories | |
3 | The importance of social reality in the formation process of fiqh | |
4 | Basic concepts and methods regulating religion-society relations | |
5 | Legalization of fiqh: reasons, appearances | |
6 | Social integrity in fiqh thought | |
7 | Fiqh perspective in terms of identity formation | |
8 | Fiqh as living law: conciliation and mediation | |
9 | Poverty problem and legal possibilities | |
10 | Fiqh and Crime | |
11 | Faqih and community relations | |
12 | Faqih and political relations | |
13 | Social change and fiqh | |
14 | Secularization and fiqh |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
1- M. Salih Kumaş, İslam Hukuk Sosyolojisi, Ensar Yayn. 2- Ahmet YAMAN, “Fakih ve Ahlâk -Fıkıh Etiği Üzerine Bazı Notlar-”, Usûl Dergisi, sy. 26 (2016), ss. 7-50. 3- Max WEBER , Sosyal Bilimler Metodolojisi, çev. Vefa Saygın Öğütle, 2. bs., İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2012. 4- Mustafa Tekin, Fıkıh Sosyolojisi, Ankara: Eskiyeni Yayınları, 2016. 5- Murat ŞİMŞEK , “Fıkıhta Dünyevileşmeye Tepki: Gazzâlî Örneği”, Uluslararası Modern Çağ ve Gazzâlî Sempozyumu, 2014, 229-41. 6- Ali ŞERİATİ , İslam Sosyolojisi, çev. Kenan Sökmen, Birleşik Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 1993. 7- Recep ŞENTÜRK , İslâm Dünyasında Modernleşme ve Toplumbilim -Türkiye ve Mısır Örneği-, 3. bs., İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2016. 8- Mehmet Tevfik ÖZCAN , Hukuk Sosyolojisine Giriş, 5. bs., İstanbul: On İki Levha Yayınları, 2015. 9- Abdullah Kahraman, “Fakihin Toplumsal Rolü”, Eski Yeni: Anadolu İlahiyat Akademisi Araştırma Dergisi, sy. 24 (2012), ss. 93-97. 10- Vejdi BİLGİN, Fakih ve Toplum, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2003. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 100 |
Total | 1 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 0 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 100 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Multiple choice and classic exam | |
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 9 | 126 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Total WorkLoad | 180 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 6 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 6 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |