1 | Course Title: | COMPARATIVE CLASSICAL FIQH TEXTS |
2 | Course Code: | TIB5125 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | Second Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 1 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 6 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | None |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Doç. Dr. EREN GÜNDÜZ |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Prof. Dr. Ali Kaya, Prof. Dr. Halil İbrahim Acar, Doç. Dr. Abdürrahim Kozalı, Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet Salih Kumaş |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | egunduz@uludag.edu.tr |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | To get skills to be able to compare fiqh texts written in classical periods in terms of language, style, content and methodology |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | Gains the ability to understand and interpret classical fiqh texts. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | The concept of classical fiqh texts and the formation of classical fiqh texts | |
2 | Main basic fiqh texts of Sunni and non-Sunni fiqh schools | |
3 | Reading methods of classical fiqh texts and comparative analysis | |
4 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of sect difference | |
5 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of period difference | |
6 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of period difference | |
7 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of the difference between scientific tradition | |
8 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of the difference in copyright type | |
9 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of their relation to creed sects | |
10 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of subject classification | |
11 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of language and style | |
12 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of source value | |
13 | Comparison of classical fiqh texts in terms of function difference | |
14 | Classical fiqh books in terms of matn, sharh, hashiye and ta'leeq |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
1.Muhammed b. Hasan al-Shaybâni, al-Jâmi al-Kabeer. 2. Malik b. Enes, al-Muvatta. 3. Muhammed b. İdris eş-Shâfiî, el-Umm, I-XI. 4. Şemsuddin Ebu Bekr al-Sarakhsi, al-Mabsut, I-XXX, 5. Margînânî, el-Hidâye Sharh Bidâya al-Mubtadi, II-IV. 6. İbn Ruşd, Bidaye al-Mujtahid, İstanbul, 1985. 7. Muvaffakuddin İbn Kudama, al-Muğni, I-XV. 8. Ebu Zakariya Muhyiddin al-Nawawi, al-Majmu 9. Kâsanî, al-Badayi, 10. Shammâhî, Kitâb al-îzâh 11. İbn Hazm, al-Muhallâ 12. İbn al-Mutaza, al-Azhâr 13. Muhakkik al-Hillî, Sharâyi' al-Islâm |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 100 |
Total | 1 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 0 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 100 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Written exam, open-ended elective questions | |
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 10 | 140 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Total WorkLoad | 184 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 6,13 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 6 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |