1 | Course Title: | INTERGROUP RELATIONS |
2 | Course Code: | PSI5114 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | Second Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 2 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 5 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | None |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. M.ERSİN KUŞDİL |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Prof. Dr. M.ERSİN KUŞDİL |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. M. Ersin KUŞDİL Tel: 0 224 2941872 Faks: 0 224 2941897 E-posta: mekusdil@uludag.edu.tr |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | The aim of the course is to cover the topic of intergroup relations, which is a majör area of research in social psychology. The main target of the course is to teach students the prominent theoretical approaches aiming to explain the prejudice and discrimination between human groups. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | An overview of the goals and the procedure of the course | |
2 | A short history of the studies realized on intergroup relations in the area of social psychology (Group mind) | |
3 | Individual-level accounts of intergroup relations and criticisms (Freud, McDougal, Allport, Adorno) | |
4 | Individual-level accounts of intergroup relations and criticisms (the Frustration- Aggression Hypothesis, Relative Deprivation approach, Arousal transfer) | |
5 | First group-level explanations of intergroup relations (M. Sherif) and criticisms | |
6 | Conceptual and methodological aspects of the Social Identity Theory of Tajfel and Turner (the Minimal Group Paradigm, categorization, ingroup favoritism) | |
7 | Midterm & Review | |
8 | An overview and the critique of the studies related to the Social Identity Theory | |
9 | An overview and the critique of the studies related to the Social Dominance Theory | |
10 | An overview and the critique of the studies related to the System Justification Theory | |
11 | A comparison of the System Justification, the Social Dominance, and the Social Identity theories | |
12 | Students’ seminars | |
13 | Students’ seminars | |
14 | A final review of the course activities |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (2000). Social Identity. Oxford: Blackwell Pub. Hogg, M.A., & Abrams, D. (1995) Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of İntergroup Relations and Group Processes, London: Routledge. Huddy, L. (2004). Contrasting Theoretical Approaches to İntergroup Relations. Political Psychology, 25, 947-967. Jost, J T.; Banaji, M. R.; Nosek, B. A. (2004). A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (2001). Social Dominance: An İntergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 20 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 2 | 20 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 4 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | ||
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 12 | 4 | 48 |
Homeworks, Performances | 2 | 15 | 30 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total WorkLoad | 150 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 5 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 5 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |