| 1 | Course Title: | COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES |
| 2 | Course Code: | SAB6011 |
| 3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
| 4 | Level of Course: | Third Cycle |
| 5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
| 6 | Semester: | 1 |
| 7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 3 |
| 8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
| 9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 11 | Prerequisites: | None |
| 12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
| 13 | Language: | Turkish |
| 14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| 15 | Course Coordinator: | Doç. Dr. SELMA GÜLEÇ |
| 16 | Course Lecturers: | Yok |
| 17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
Doç.Dr. Selma GÜLEÇ B. U.Ü Eğitim Fakültesi A Blok 16056 Nilüfer Bursa E Mail: sgulec@uludag.edu.tr |
| 18 | Website: | |
| 19 | Objective of the Course: | To provide doctoral students in different health branches with the skills to use communication effectively. |
| 20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | It contributes to knowing communication obstacles and solutions, thinking empathetically, and using body language effectively. |
| 21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
| 22 | Course Content: |
| Week | Theoretical | Practical |
| 1 | Communication concept and its importance | |
| 2 | Communication models | |
| 3 | Factors hindering communication | |
| 4 | Factors hindering communication and solutions | |
| 5 | Conflict management in effective communication | |
| 6 | Persuasive Communication | |
| 7 | Non-verbal communication | |
| 8 | Mobbing concept | |
| 9 | Self-disclosure in effective communication | |
| 10 | Emotional intelligence in effective communication | |
| 11 | Dealing with difficult people | |
| 12 | Empathy in effective communication | |
| 13 | Dimensions of cultural communication | |
| 14 | General evaluation |
| 23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Aziz, A. (2010). İletişime giriş. İstanbul: Hiperlink. Baltaş, Z. ve Baltaş, A. (2007). Bedenin dili (42. Baskı,) İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi Acar, Z. (2018). İletişim engelleri. M. Işık (Ed.), İletişim ve etik (4. Baskı) içinde (s. 19-27). Konya: Eğitim. Güngör, N. (2011). İletişim. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. Işık, M. (2012). Kitle iletişim teorilerine giriş. Eğitim Yayınevi. Korkut, F. (2005). Yetişkinlere yönelik iletişim becerileri eğitimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28), 143-149. Avcı, Ö. (2019). Duygusal zeka ve iletişim. Vural, İ., Tuna, Y., Birsen, Ö., Erzurum, F., Küçük, M., & Çolak, F. Ü. (2012). İletişim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Alim, K. A. Y. A. (2018). İnsan ilişkileri ve iletişim. Aytekin, H. (2018). İnsan ilişkileri ve iletişim. Baskı, Pegem Akademi Yayınları, Ankara. Karahan, T. F., Sardoğan, M. E., GÜVEN, M. Ç., ÖZKAMALI, E., & Dicle, A. N. (2006). İnsan İlişkileri ve İletişim Dersi'nin Öğretmen Adaylarının Çatışma Çözme ve Empatik Beceri Düzeylerine Etkisi. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (23). Kaya, A. (2014). Yönetimde insan ilişkilerinin sırları. Eğitim Yayınevi. |
| 24 | Assesment |
| TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
| Midterm Exam | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 3 | 40 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 4 | 100 |
| Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
| Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | There will be a written and final exam (100%) in the course. Absolute assessment will be applied. | |
| Information | Homework that students prepare during the term will also be evaluated. | |
| 25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
| Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
| Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midtermexams | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total WorkLoad | 97 | ||
| Total workload/ 30 hr | 3,23 | ||
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 3 |
| 26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
| Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |