1 | Course Title: | TRADITIONAL TURKISH THEATER PRACTICE |
2 | Course Code: | GSO2022 |
3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 4 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 3 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 1 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 1 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | to be successfull from the lesson with the name of Traditional Turkish Theatre |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Dr. Ögr. Üyesi BANU ÇAKMAK DUMAN |
16 | Course Lecturers: | yok |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | bcakmak@uludag.edu.tr, 0 224 543 10 15, U. Ü. Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Mudanya / Bursa |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | The structure features of Traditional Turkish Theatre are sources for our contemporary theatre. The aim of the lesson is to teach this features and to show how is used in contemporary play writing. However it is aimed to make pratctice. So the students write and stage plays in this lesson. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | To learn writing and playing Traditional Turkish Theatre plays. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | To learn the structure features of Traditional Turkish Theatre: open form | Reading plays for example |
2 | To learn the structure features of Traditional Turkish Theatre: fragmented structure, abstraction | Reading plays for example |
3 | The common features of Traditional Turkish Theatre and Contemporary Theatre | to compare Traditional Turkish Theatre and Contemporary Theatre |
4 | Usage of Traditional Turkish Theatre in Contemporary Texts | Analyze of Murathan Mungan’s play with the name of Taziye |
5 | Usage of Traditional Turkish Theatre in Contemporary Texts | Analyze of Bilgesu Erenus’s play with the name of Misafir |
6 | Usage of Traditional Turkish Theatre in Contemporary Texts | Analyze of Haldun Taner’s play with the name of Keşanlı Ali Destanı |
7 | Usage of Traditional Turkish Theatre in Contemporary Texts | Analyze of Sermet Çağan’s play with the name of Ayak Bacak Fabrikası |
8 | A general evolution | To critique the texts |
9 | Playing/ writing the Karagöz play | Reading/ watching or staging the Karagöz play for example |
10 | Playing/ writing the Orta Oyunu play | Reading/ watching or staging the Orta Oyunu play for example |
11 | Playing/ writing the Orta Oyunu play | Reading/ watching or staging the Orta Oyunu play for example |
12 | Playing/ writing the Meddah play | Reading/ watching or staging the Meddah play for example |
13 | Playing/ writing the Contemporary Text starting from our Traditional Theatre | Reading/ watching or staging the contemporary play for example |
14 | Playing/ writing the Contemporary Text starting from our Traditional Theatre | Reading/ watching or staging the contemporary play for example |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
- Cevdet Kudret, Orta Oyunu, YKY, İstanbul. - Cevdet Kudret, Karagöz, Bilgi yayınları, Ankara. - Özdemir Nutku, Meddahlık ve Meddah Hikayeleri, AKM Yayınları, İstanbul. - Bilgesu Erenus, Misafir, Mitos Boyut, İstanbul. - Murathan Mungan, Taziye, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. - Haldun Taner, Keşanlı Ali Destanı, Bilgi Yayınları, Ankara. -Sermet Çağan, Ayak Bacak Fabrikası, Mitos Boyut, İstanbul. - Nurhan Tekerek, Köy Seyirlik Oyunları, Mitos Boyut, İstanbul. - Yavuz Pekman, Çağdaş Tiyatromuzda Geleneksellik, Mitos Boyut, İstanbul. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 2 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Evaluation is done through midterm and final exams. | |
Information | Extracurricular studies and class participation are also considered in the assessment. |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 1 | 14 |
Practicals/Labs | 14 | 1 | 14 |
Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 2 | 28 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Total WorkLoad | 90 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 3 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 3 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |