1 | Course Title: | AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY |
2 | Course Code: | TAR2308 |
3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 4 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 2 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | yok |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. NAZAN DAĞÜSTÜ |
16 | Course Lecturers: | yok |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | ndagustu@uludag.edu.tr, 224 2941518, U.U. Field Crops Department, Faculty of Agriculture 16059 Görükle Campus Bursa |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | The aim of this course is to provide information about applications in the field of agricultural biotechnology such as plant tissue culture and plant transformation techniques. The course will specifically focus on how agricultural biotechnology affects global food security and the environmental ecosystem. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | Learns the applications of biotechnology, one of the new breeding methods in agriculture. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | What is the mean of biotechnology and What are the types of biotechnology | |
2 | Historical development of biotechnology-Different approaches to the past, present and future of biotechnological applications | |
3 | Modern biotechnology applications for agricultural purposes | |
4 | Biotechnology applications in food | |
5 | Biotechnology applications in health | |
6 | Biotechnology applications for the environment | |
7 | Transgenic Applications: Genetically modified organisms and products (GMO) | |
8 | GMOs in the world and the European Union | |
9 | GMO risks and concerns | |
10 | Recommended risk management system in terms of biosecurity and biodiversity | |
11 | International and national structuring studies in terms of biosecurity | |
12 | Convention on biological diversity Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety | |
13 | National biosafety law, conclusions and recommendations | |
14 | Biosecurity practices in our country |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
1. Topal, Ş. Biyogüvenlik ve Biyoteknoloji, Cemturan Ofset Matbaası, 2006 2. Anonim. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Concil Directive 90/220/EEC–Commission Decleration. OJ L 106, 17/04/2001. P.0001-0039. 3. Karagöz, A., N. Zincirci, A. Tan, T. Tuncer, H. Köksel, M. Sürek, C. Toker, K. Özbek. Bitki Genetik Kaynaklarının Korunması ve Kullanımı. In: TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisliği Odası, Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı -1. 11-15 Ocak 2010, Ankara. p. 155-177. 4. James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2009 The first fourteen years, 1996 to 2009. ISAAA Brief no:41-2009. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY. Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2010 http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/41/default.asp 5. Anonim. International Labour Organization (ILO). http://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm Erişim Tarihi: 22.02.2010 6. Anonim. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). http://www.ifad.org/ Erişim Tarihi: 22.02.2010 7. Renckens, S. Avrupa Gıda Güvenliği Kurumu EFSA ve AB’de GDO’ların Bilimsel Risk Değerlendirmesi. In:GDO GERÇEĞİ “Modern Biyoteknoloji, Genetiği Değiştirilmiş Organizmalar ve Gıda Güvenliği Konferans Notları” Gıda Dernekleri Federasyonu, İstanbul 2004. p. 48-68. 8. Anonim. EUROPA http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biotechnology/authorisation/index_en.htm Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2010. 9. Babaoğlu, M., E. Gürel ve S. Özcan. 2001. Bitki Biyoteknolojisi. Doku kültürü ve uygulamaları. Selç. Üniv. Vakf. Yay. Tak no:975-6652-03-9, 374 s 10. Finamore, A., M. Ruselli, S. Britti, G. Monastra, R. Ambra, A. Turrini, E. Mengheri. Intestinal and Peripheral Immune Response to MON 810 Maize Ingestion in Weaning and Old Mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008; DOI:10.1021/jf802059w. 11. Huangfu, C., X. Song, S. Qiang. ISSR variation within and among wild Brassica juncea populations: implication for herbicide reristance evolution. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2009; 56:913-924. 12. Quist, D. and I.H. Chapela. Transgenik DNA introgressed into tradiotinal maize landraces in Oxaca, Mexico. Nature, 2001; 414:541-543. 13. Anonim. FAOSTAT. http://www.faostat.fao.org Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2010 14. Anonim. USDA Foeign Agricultural Service. http://www.fas.usda.gov/ E.T.: 23.02.2010 15. Plant Biotechnology in Agriculture, 1989. K. Lindsey and M.G.K., John, Wiley &Sons, Inc., New York. 16. Bitki Biyoteknolojisi, 1999. R. Hatipoğlu, Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No: 190 Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-58.Bett, K.S. Mounting evidence of genetic pollution from GE crops growing evidence of widespread GDO. 1999. http://www.purefood.org/ge/gepollution.cfm E.T.: 24.02.2010 17. E. OLHAN, 2010. Modern biyoteknolojinin tarımda kullanımının politik ve ekonomik yönden değerlendirilmesi. Farklı Boyutlarıyla Genetiği Değiştirilmiş Organizmalar, 9-14. 18. Ellstrand N. 2003. Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. The Royal Society, Philosophical Transactions, 1163-1170. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 2 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Bursa Uludağ University is evaluated according to the principles of the Associate and Undergraduate Education Regulation | |
Information | Results are determined by the letter grade determined by the student automation system |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 6 | 6 | 36 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total WorkLoad | 66 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 2,2 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 2 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |