1 | Course Title: | AESTHETICS |
2 | Course Code: | GSR2011 |
3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 3 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 2 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Doç. Dr. Tolga Şenol |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Doç.Tolga ŞENOL |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
0 224 2940897 tolgasenol@uludag.edu.tr Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Resim Bölümü, Görükle Kampüsü / BURSA Assoc. Prof. Tolga SENOL:Bursa Uludag Universty, Fine Arts Faculty, Painting Department, Görükle Campus / BURSA |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | Taking the concept of aesthetics as a science, determining its scope, and also interpreting and exploring the relationship between the phenomena of aesthetics in the context of visual arts in the context of the ideas put forward starting from the ancient period to the 21st century. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | Providing in-depth knowledge about the concept of aesthetics; It supports the formation of a person who can consider, think, question and criticize the theoretical and practical fields as a whole. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Definition of Aesthetics Concept | |
2 | Analysis of Aesthetic Phenomena | |
3 | Variables in the Definitions of Aesthetic Phenomenon in the 20th Century and After | |
4 | Aesthetic Subject Analysis | |
5 | Aesthetic Attitude | |
6 | Aesthetic Object Analysis - Phenomenological Analysis | |
7 | Aesthetic Object Analysis - Phenomenological Analysis | |
8 | Aesthetic Object Analysis-Ontological Analysis | |
9 | Aesthetic Value Analysis | |
10 | Artwork, Artistic Content, Artistic Form | |
11 | Relationship of Beauty, Righteousness, Usefulness, Good, Pleasant, Supreme and Aesthetics | |
12 | Relationship of Beauty, Righteousness, Usefulness, Good, Pleasant, Supreme and Aesthetics | |
13 | Aesthetic Judgment Analysis | |
14 | Discussion of visual arts in the context of the concept of Fine, Ethics and Knowledge |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
• De Bolla, Peter; Kubilay Koş, Sanat ve Estetik, Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2006 • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F.; Taylan Altuğ, Hakkı Hünler , Estetik / Güzel Sanatlar Üzerine Dersler I, Payel Yayınevi, İstanbul • Jimenez, Marc; Aytekin Karaçoban, Estetik Nedir, Doruk Yayımcılık, İstanbul, 2008 • Kagan , Moıssej; Estetik ve Sanat Notları, Karakalem Kitabevi Yayınları, 2009 • Kagan, M.; “Estetik ve Sanat Dersleri”, Çeviren: Aziz Çalışlar, 2. Basım, İmge Kitabevi, İstanbul 1993. • Lucas, George; Estetik I-II(çeviren: Ahmet Cemal),Payel Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1978,1981 • Bozkurt, Nejat; “Sanat ve Estetik Kuramları”, asa Kitabevi, 4. Basım, Bursa 2004. • Turgut, İhsan; “Sanat Felsefesi” Akademi Kitabevi, İstanbul 1993. • Farago, France; “Sanat”, Çeviren Özcan Doğan, Doğu Batı Yayınları, I. Basım, Ankara 2006. • Turani, Adnan; “Çağdaş Sanat Felsefesi”, Remzi Kitabevi, 5. Basım, Ankara 2006. • Tunalı, İsmail, “Estetik”, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1996 • Tunalı, İsmail, “Grek Estetiği”, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1996 • Timuçin, Afşar, “Estetik”, Bulut Yayınları, 2008 • Cömert, Bedrettin, “Estetik”, De Ki Basım Yayın, 2008 • Eco, Umberto, “Arte e Bellezza Nell'estetica Medievale - Ortaçağ Estetiğinde Güzellik”, Çev: Kemal Atakay, Can Yayınları, 1998 • Eco, Umberto, “Güzelliğin Tarihi”, Çev: Ali Cevap Akkoyunlu, Doğan Kitap, 2006 • Eco, Umberto, “ Çirkinliğin Tarihi”, Doğan Kitap, 2009 • Aristoteles, “Metafizik”, Çev: Ahmet Arslan, Sosyal Yayınlar, 1996 • Afşar, Timuçin, Estetik, Bulut Yayınları, İst. 2002 • Eaton, Marcia Muelder, “Basic Issues in Aesthetics”, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont California, 1988 • Kagan, Moıssej, “Estetik ve Sanat”, Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi. İst. 1982 • Enişehirlioğlu, Şahin Y., Filiz Yenişehirlioğlu, M. Erinç Sıtkı, “Sanata Giriş ve Estetik”, Anadolu Üniv. Açıköğretim Yay. Eskişehir 1993 • Yılmaz, Mehmet (Hzr.), “Sanatın Felsefesi Felsefenin Sanatı”, Ütopya Yayınevi, Ankara, 2009 |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 2 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | 1: Lecture, 2: Question-Answer, 3: Discussion, | |
Information | Absolute or relative evaluation is made according to the number of students taking the course. |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 12 | 1 | 12 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Total WorkLoad | 70 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 2 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 2 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |