1 | Course Title: | FURNITURE DESIGN AND URBAN FURNITURE |
2 | Course Code: | PYZ3017-S |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 3 |
6 | Semester: | 5 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 3 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 1 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 2 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | None |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Doç. Dr. Elvan ENDER ALTAY |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Yok |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
Doç. Dr. Elvan ENDER ALTAY Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, 16110 Nilüfer/Bursa elvanender@uludag.edu.tr 0 224-294 1639 |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | The aim of the course is to give the details of road-car parks, floor elements, surface coatings, containment elements, amphitheater, stage, terraces and tribunes, urban furniture and equipment details. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | The information gathered in this course enables to learn the principles of using urban furniture in landscaping and to design original furniture elements. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Explain the concepts of reinforcement design and urban furniture in detail | |
2 | Explain the concepts of reinforcement design and urban furniture in detail | |
3 | Classification of urban furniture, urban furniture depending on infrastructure, examples | |
4 | Classification of urban furniture, urban furniture depending on infrastructure, examples | |
5 | The concept of reinforcement and the concepts of reinforcement design | |
6 | Reinforcement Design: Lighting Elements | |
7 | Reinforcement Design: Seat Elements | |
8 | Reinforcement Design: Seat Elements | |
9 | Reinforcement Design: Flooring Elements | |
10 | Reinforcement Design: Bordering Elements | |
11 | Reinforcement Design: Information and Guidance Elements | |
12 | Reinforcement Design: Shading Elements and Bus Stations | |
13 | Reinforcement Design: Flower Pots and Trash Cans | |
14 | Reinforcement design: Other elements (amphi, stage, tribune, etc.) |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
• Uzun, G., 1999. Peyzaj Konstrüksiyonu. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 125, Kitap Yayın No: 37, Adana. • Harris, C. W., Dines, N. T., Brown, K. D. (Editors), 1998. Time-Saver Standards for Landscape Architecture: Design and Construction Data. McGraw-Hill, New York. • Landphair, H. C., F. Klatt, Jr., 1979. Landscape Architecture Construction. Elsevier, New York. • Harris, C. W., Dines, N. T., Brown, K. D. (Editors), 1998. Time-Saver Standards for Landscape Architecture: Design and Construction Data. McGraw-Hill, New York. • Landphair, H. C., F. Klatt, Jr., 1979. Landscape Architecture Construction. Elsevier, New York. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 2 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | It is evaluated by relative evaluation by making a midterm and a final exam. | |
Information | Relative evaluation is made with 40% midterm exam and 60% final exam. |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 1 | 14 |
Practicals/Labs | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Total WorkLoad | 100 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 3 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 3 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |