1 | Course Title: | ERRORLESS TEACHING PROCEDURES |
2 | Course Code: | ÖZE2311 |
3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 3 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | None |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Öğr. Gör. Dr. OYA ARSLAN ARMUTCU |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Yok |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | oyaarslanarmutcu@uludag.edu.tr |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | This course aims to teach the development of psychomotor skills of individuals with special needs and adaptations to support their psychomotor skills. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | At the end of this course, students write a goal at the level of acquisition-fluency-maintaine and generalization in relation to skill teaching; they analyze skills; explain determination of performance level in skill with single opportunity method; explain the types and uses of clues; write teaching processes. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Acquisition-fluency- maintaine and generalization stages | |
2 | Acquisition-fluency- maintaine and generalization stages | |
3 | Task analysis, performance acquisition with a single opportunity method | |
4 | Performance purchase with multiple opportunity method | |
5 | Purpose writing | |
6 | simultaneous prompting procedure instruction plans. | |
7 | simultaneous prompting procedure instruction plans. | |
8 | constant time-delay procedure instruction plans | |
9 | constant time-delay procedure instruction plans | |
10 | progressive time-delay procedure instruction plans | |
11 | antecedent prompt instruction plans | |
12 | system of least prompt instruction plans | |
13 | system of most prompt instruction plans | |
14 | Discussing the effectiveness and efficiency of teaching methods |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
WOLERY, M., AULT, M.J., GAST, D.L., DOYLE, P.M. and GRIFFEN, K.A. (1990). Comparison of Constant Time-Delay And The System of Least Prompts in Teaching Chained Tasks. Education and Training in the Mental Retardation. 243-257. SNELL, M., and BROWN, F. (1993). Instructional Planning and Implementation. Instruction of students with severe Disabilities. SNELL, M.E (Ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. TEKİN-İFTAR, E.(2003). Effectiveness of peer Delivered Simultaneous Prompting on Teaching Community Signs to Students with Developmental Disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 38(1), 77-94 TEKİN-İFTAR, E. ; ACAR, G. ; KURT, O; (2003). The Effects Of Simultaneous Prompting On Teaching Expressive Identification Of Objects: an instructive feedback study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 2 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Midterm Exam Final Exam | |
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 4 | 12 | 48 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 10 | 40 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total WorkLoad | 118 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 3,93 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |