1 | Course Title: | CURRENT LANGUAGE PROBLEMS |
2 | Course Code: | TDE0501 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 3 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | There is no prerequisite for this course. |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. Hatice Şahin |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ebru Kuybu Durmaz |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
hatices@uludag.edu.tr 02242941812 Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | Teach Turkish contemporary issues |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | To learn the correct and effective ways of using Turkish and to gain the ability to express oneself. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Power of Turkish | |
2 | Overview of the problems of the Turkey Turkish | |
3 | Pollution caused by foreign words; adverse structures and negative effects on language | |
4 | Incomplete structures and theirs negative effects on communication | |
5 | The role of defective units in disrupting communication | |
6 | The share of unused, unnecessary and meaningless words in language pollution | |
7 | Misapplications in abbreviations and their effect on analogy | |
8 | The negativity caused by the wrong order of sentence units and the failure to execute the rules of the language | |
9 | The role of using the wrong item in disrupting communication | |
10 | The drawbacks of using incorrect auxiliary verbs | |
11 | Disruption of mold structures | |
12 | Creating language pollution of slang, vulgar, ugly words | |
13 | Efforts to say Turkish as in Western languages | |
14 | Use of Turkish in Mass Media and on the Internet |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Türk Dilinin Çağdaş Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri, Editör: Doç. Dr. Cüneyt Akın, Bilgi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2018. Astrid Menz-Christoph Schroeder; Türkiye’de Dil Tartışmaları, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2008. Doğan Aksan; Dil, Şu Büyülü Düzen, Bilgi Yayınları, Ankara, 2003 Doğan Aksan; Türkçenin Gücü, Türk Dilinin Zenginliklerine Tanıklar, İş Bankası Yay., Ankara, 1987. Doğan Aksan; Türkçenin Söz Varlığı, Engin Yayınevi, Ankara, 1996. Günay Karaağaç; Türkçenin Dünya Dillerine Etkisi, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara, 2004. Gürer Gülsevin - Erdoğan Boz; Türkçenin Çağdaş Sorunları, Divan Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2006. Hayati Develi; Dil Doktoru, Kesit Yayınları, İstanbul, 2008. Kerime Üstünova; Dil Yazıları, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara, 2011. Mustafa Argunşah; Sözüm Türkçe Üstüne, Kesit Yayınları, İstanbul 2008. Nermi Uygur; Dilin Gücü, Kabalcı Yayınları, İstanbul, 1994. Ömer Asım Aksoy; Dil Yanlışları, TDK Yay., Ankara, 1980. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 30 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 10 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 3 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | The system of relative evaluation is applied. | |
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total WorkLoad | 140 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 4 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |