Türkçe English Rapor to Course Content
COURSE SYLLABUS
DISCOURSE KNOWLEDGE AND GENRE THEORY
1 Course Title: DISCOURSE KNOWLEDGE AND GENRE THEORY
2 Course Code: TUR5129
3 Type of Course: Optional
4 Level of Course: Second Cycle
5 Year of Study: 1
6 Semester: 1
7 ECTS Credits Allocated: 6
8 Theoretical (hour/week): 2
9 Practice (hour/week) : 0
10 Laboratory (hour/week) : 0
11 Prerequisites:
12 Recommended optional programme components: None
13 Language: Turkish
14 Mode of Delivery: Face to face
15 Course Coordinator: Prof. Dr. FERHAT ENSAR
16 Course Lecturers:
17 Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: doç. dr. ferhat ensar
ferhatensar@uludag.edu.tr
18 Website:
19 Objective of the Course: It is aimed that students will understand the basic elements and theories of discourse analysis. It is aimed to discuss new developments, problems and expectations in the field.
20 Contribution of the Course to Professional Development Linguistics and discourse, discourse and society, philosophy and discourse, psychology and discourse, etc. Examination of small-scale approaches such as grammar and discourse, meaning and discourse, dictionary and discourse with large-scale approaches.
21 Learning Outcomes:
22 Course Content:
Week Theoretical Practical
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
23 Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton (Eds.) 2001. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishers.
Van Dijk, Teun. 1997. Discourse As Structure and Process London: Sage Publications.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge: Blackwell
Coulthard, M. (1977). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Londra: Longman
Gee, P. J. (1999). Introduction to discourse analysis. NY : Routledge Widdowson,
H.G. Widdowson (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. Discourse analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.
Halliday, M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold, 1994.
Johnstone, Barbara.Discourse Analysis. USA: Blackwell Publishing. 2008
Renkema, J. Discourse studies: an introductory textbook. Benjamins, 1993.
Paltridge, B. (1995). Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 393-406.
Britton, B.K. and Black, J.B. (1985). Understanding expository text: From structure to process and world knowledge. In B.K. Britton and J.B. Black (Eds.). Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fludernik, M. (2000). Genres, text types, or discourse modes? Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Sytle, 34.
Gates, V. P., Duke N. K. and Martineau, J A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42 (1), 8-45.
Berman, Ruth A., Nir-sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing Narrative and Expository Text Construction Across Adolescence: A Developmental Paradox. Discourse Processes, 43 (2), 79-120
Bachman, L.F. (1987). The development and use of criterion-referenced tests of language ability in program evaluation. The Second Language Curriculum. (Ed. Robert Keith Johnson). New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, (pp. 243-258)
Alderson, C., Clapham, C. and Wall, D. (1995). Language Test Construction And Evaluation (cambridge Language Teaching Library). Cambridge University
Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7 (3), 161-195.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The Represantation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Mannes, S.M. and Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), 91-115.
Horowitz, R. (1987). Rhetorical structure in discourse processing. In R. Horowitz and S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 117–160). NY: Academic Press.
24 Assesment
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES NUMBER PERCENT
Midterm Exam 1 40
Quiz 0 0
Homeworks, Performances 0 0
Final Exam 1 60
Total 2 100
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade 40
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade 60
Total 100
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course Measurement and evaluation is carried out according to the priciples of Bursa Uludag University Graduate Education Regulation.
Information
25 ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE
Activites NUMBER TIME [Hour] Total WorkLoad [Hour]
Theoretical 14 2 28
Practicals/Labs 0 0 0
Self Study and Preparation 14 10 140
Homeworks, Performances 0 0 0
Projects 0 0 0
Field Studies 0 0 0
Midtermexams 1 3 3
Others 0 0 0
Final Exams 1 5 5
Total WorkLoad 176
Total workload/ 30 hr 5,87
ECTS Credit of the Course 6
26 CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS
PQ1 PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12
LO1 3 4 4 0 5 0 2 4 4 0 0 4
LO2 4 4 3 4 5 4 0 5 4 5 0 4
LO3 2 4 5 4 4 5 4 0 4 0 4 5
LO4 2 3 4 2 0 2 3 0 3 3 0 3
LO5 2 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 2
LO6 3 0 2 0 3 3 4 5 3 4 0 0
LO7 3 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 0 0 3
LO8 4 5 0 0 0 3 5 5 0 4 0 5
LO: Learning Objectives PQ: Program Qualifications
Contribution Level: 1 Very Low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High
Bologna Communication
E-Mail : bologna@uludag.edu.tr
Design and Coding
Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı © 2015
otomasyon@uludag.edu.tr