1	Course Title:	WRITING TECHNIQUES IN MODERN PLAY AND RELATIONS BETWEEN TEXTS
2	Course Code:	SSY5121
3	Type of Course:	Optional
4	Level of Course:	Second Cycle
5	Year of Study:	1
6	Semester:	1
7	ECTS Credits Allocated:	5
8	Theoretical (hour/week):	2
9	Practice (hour/week) :	0
10	Laboratory (hour/week) :	0
11	Prerequisites:	none
12	Recommended optional programme components:	None
13	Language:	Turkish
14	Mode of Delivery:	Face to face
15	Course Coordinator:	Dr. Ögr. Üyesi BANU ÇAKMAK DUMAN
16	Course Lecturers:	yok
17	Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator:	Öğr. Gör. Dr. Banu ÇAKMAK DUMAN bcakmak@uludag.edu.tr, 02245431015, U.Ü. Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Mudanya/Bursa
18	Website:
19	Objective of the Course:	The classical dramatic structure was destroyed in theatre step by step, in modern era, as a result of improvements which are lived in scienes and arts. Thus, a new term started for the play writing in modern era. So the aim of this lesson, analyse the change of play writing with examples which are avant-garde, epic and absurd plays. Also describe the notion of intertextual relationship which occurred in modern theatre.
20	Contribution of the Course to Professional Development	It provides an introduction to the concept of intertextual relations that emerged with modern theater.

21

Learning Outcomes:

1 Have information about modern era, modern art and modern thinking.; 2 Understand the general features of modern theatre; 3 Analyse the avant-garde plays; 4 Analyse the epic and absurd plays; 5 Understand how the classical dramatic structure was destroyed in theatre; 6 See the notion of intertextual relationship ; 7 Learn the kind of intertextual relationship;

22	Course Content:

Week	Theoretical	Practical
1	Social conditions which caused the modern era
2	The basic features of modern thinking
3	Modern art and modern theatre
4	The basic features of avant-garde theatre
5	Analyse how the classical dramatic structure was destroyed in theatre by avant-garde plays: symbolism, abstraction, grotesque…
6	The basic features of epic theatre
7	Analyse how the classical dramatic structure was destroyed in theatre by epic plays: alienation, historicizing, gestus, dialectic
8	Analyse how the classical dramatic structure was destroyed in theatre by epic plays: alienation, historicizing, gestus, dialectic
9	The basic features of absurd theatre
10	The absurd theatre which is the last stage of the classical dramatic structure’s collapse
11	Analyse the examples from absurd theatre comparatively
12	Rise of intertextual relationship
13	General look at the kind of intertextual relationship: citation, parody, pastiche, irony
14	Examples from Turkish theatre about modern play writing

23	Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials:	• Marshall Berman, Katı Olan Her Şey Buharlaşıyor, Çev. Ümit Altuğ, Bülent Peker, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, 2006 • William R. Everdell, İlk Modernler, Çev. Hülya Kocaoluk, İstanbul, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2006 • Anthony Giddens, Modernite ve Bireysel Kimlik, Çev. Ümit Tatlıcan, İstanbul, Say Yayınları, 2010 • Cristopher Ines, Avangart Tiyatro, Çev. Beliz Güçbilmez, Aziz Kahraman, Ankara, Dost Yayınları, 2004 • Ayşin Candan, Yirminci Yüzyılda Öncü Tiyatro, İstanbul, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2003 • Lionel Richard, Ekspresyonizm Sanat Ansiklopedisi, Çev. Beral Madra, İlham Usmanbaş, Sinem Gürsoy, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 2005 • Rene Passeron, Sürrealizm Sanat Ansiklopedisi, Çev. Sezer Tansuğ, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 1996 • E. H. Gombrich, Sanatın Öyküsü, Çev. Erol Erduran, Ömer Erduran, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 1999 • Nazım Uğur Özüaydın, 20. Yüzyılda Estetik Düşünce, İstanbul, Mitos Boyut Yayınları, 2006 • Vsevolod Meyerhold, Tiyatro Devrim ve Meyerhold, Haz. Ali Berktay, İstanbul, İstanbul, Mitos Boyut Yayınları, 2000 • Bertolt Brecht, Tiyatro İçin Küçük Organon, Çev. Ahmet Cemal, İstanbul, Mitos Boyut Yayınları, 2005 • Bertolt Brecht, Epik Tiyatro, Çev. Kamuran Şipal, İstanbul, Cem Yayınları, 1997 • Bertolt Brecht, Oyun Sanatı ve Dekor, Çev. Kamuran Şipal, İstanbul, Cem Yayınları, 1994 • Martin Esslin, Absürt Tiyatro, Çev. Güler Siper, Ankara, Dost Yayınları, 1999 • Zehra İpşiroğlu, Uyumsuz Tiyatroda Gerçekçilik, İstanbul, Mitos Boyut Yayınları, 1996 • Kubilay Aktulum, Metinlerarası İlişkiler, Ankara, Öteki Yayınevi, 2000 • Peter Szondi, Theory of The Modern Drama, ed. and trans. Michael Hays, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1987 • Fırat Güllü, “Avangart Tiyatronun Sonu”, Mimesis, 8. Sayı, 2000, s. 215-228
24	Assesment

TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES	NUMBER	PERCENT
Midterm Exam	1	40
Quiz	0	0
Homeworks, Performances	0	0
Final Exam	1	60
Total	2	100
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade		40
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade		60
Total		100
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course	Evaluation is done through midterm and final exams.
Information	Extracurricular studies and class participation are also considered in the assessment.

25

ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE

Activites	NUMBER	TIME [Hour]	Total WorkLoad [Hour]
Theoretical	14	2	28
Practicals/Labs	0	0	0
Self Study and Preparation	14	4	56
Homeworks, Performances	0	0	0
Projects	30	2	60
Field Studies	0	0	0
Midtermexams	1	2	2
Others	0	0	0
Final Exams	1	2	2
Total WorkLoad			148
Total workload/ 30 hr			4,93
ECTS Credit of the Course			5

26	CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS
PQ1 PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 LO1 2 2 3 4 2 2 0 0 LO2 2 2 3 2 3 5 0 0 LO3 1 3 4 2 1 2 0 0 LO4 3 4 1 1 3 3 0 0 LO5 3 4 2 4 3 1 0 0 LO6 2 1 3 3 2 2 0 0 LO7 2 3 3 4 3 4 0 0

LO: Learning Objectives

PQ: Program Qualifications

Contribution Level:

1 Very Low

2 Low

3 Medium

4 High

5 Very High