1 | Course Title: | VISIUL ARTS TEACHING METHODS |
2 | Course Code: | RES5104 |
3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
4 | Level of Course: | Second Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 2 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 6 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | NONE |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. GONCA ERİM |
16 | Course Lecturers: | - |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
goncae@uludag.edu.tr +90 (224) 294 25 75 Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Bölümü Resim-İş Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı Görükle Kampüsü Görükle/Bursa TÜRKİYE |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | It is aimed that our students, who have learned the history and theories of Art Education, will learn the teaching history of art and contemporary methods. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | Especially in the 21st century, methodological developments in arts education will contribute to professional development. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | What is art? What is the scope of Visual Arts Education? | |
2 | Why should we teach art? Homework: Determining the problem of art education. Article | |
3 | Visual Arts Teaching; teaching / learning approaches. The reasons why art education is included in school syllabuses | |
4 | Contemporary Theories in Visual Arts Teaching in the 21st Century | |
5 | Education and Teaching Approaches in Visual Arts Education. | |
6 | Program Contents in Visual Arts Secondary Schools | |
7 | Program Contents in Visual Arts High Schools | |
8 | Teaching Process in Visual Arts Education Brainstorm about assignments. | |
9 | Teaching Order in Visual Arts and Culture Education | |
10 | Research in Visual Arts and Cultural Education | |
11 | Popular Culture and Art Education- Thesis presentation Homework presentation Question answer | |
12 | The contribution / harms of technology to Art Education Homework presentation Question answer | |
13 | Homework presentation Question answer | |
14 | Evaluation of the term Homework presentation Question answer |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
ARTUT, Kazım., Sanat Eğitimi., Anı Pub.. Ankara ., 2001 ALAKUŞ, Ali Osman., Levent Mercin., (Editörler)., Sanat Eğitimi ve Görsel Sanatlar Öğretimi., Pegem Academic Pub.. Ankara., 2009. BUYURGAN, Serap,, Ufuk Buyurgan., Sanat Eğitimi ve Öğretimi., Pegem Academy Pub., Ankara., 2007. BROMMER, F. Gerald, Horn F. George., Art in Your Visual Environment.,Davis Pub., 1985. CHAPMAN, H. Laura., A World of Images., Davis Pub., Massachusetts.,1992. DAY, A. Robert, Çev. Gülay Aşkar Altay, Bilimsel Bir Makale Nasıl Yazılır ve Yayımlanır?, Tübitak Pub.., 2000 ETİKE , Serap., Sanat Eğitimi Yazıları., İlke Book and Pub., Ankara., 1995. FISCHNER – RATHUS, Lois., Understanding Art., 4. Edition., Prentis Hall, Inc., New Jersey., U.S.A., 1995. KIRİŞOĞLU, Olcay T. (Prof.Dr.), Prof. Dr.Mary STOCKROCKİ, Ortaöğretim Sanat Öğretimi – YÖK – World Bank, Development Project of Public Education., Ankara, 1997. KIRİŞOĞLU, Olcay T., Sanat Kültür Yaratıcılık, Pegem Academy Pub.., Ankara., 2009. KIRIŞOĞLU, Olcay., Sanatta Eğitim., Demircioğlu Press, Ankara., 1991. KURUOĞLU, Nihal., Kaynaştırılmış Sanat Eğitimi Yönteminin İlköğretimde Uygulanması ve Sonuçları., Master of Art Thesis., Ankara Un. Social Sciences Ins. , Ankara., 1997 ÖZSOY, Vedat., Görsel Sanatlar Eğitimi, Resim-İş Eğitiminin Tarihsel ve Düşünsel Temelleri., Gündüz Education and Publication., Ankara., 2003. ÖZSOY, Vedat., Nuray Mamur., Görsel Sanatlar Öğretme ve Öğrenme Yaklaşımları., PEGEM YAY., Ankara, 2019 ÖZSOY, Vedat., Ali Osman Alakuş., Görsel Sanatlar Eğitiminde Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri, Pegem Pub., Ankara., 2009. ÖZSOY, Vedat. (Editör)., Yöntem ve Teknikleri ile Görsel sanatlar Eğitiminde Uygulamalar., GÖRSED Pub., Ankara., 2006. RAGANS, Rosalind., Art Talk., Glencoe, McGraw – Hills., California., U.S.A., 1995. SAN, İnci., Sanat Eğitimi Kuramları., Tan Book and Pub.,, Ankara, 1983. STOCKROCKI, Mary., Issues in Multicultural art Education., University of Denver.,School of Art TÜRKDOĞAN, Galip., Sanat Eğitimi Yöntemleri., Kadıoğlu Press, Ankara., 1984. ÜNVER, Erdem., Sanat Eğitimi., Nobel Pub., Ankara., 2002 YILDIRIM, Ali – Hasan Şimşek, Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Pub. Ankara, 2000 |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 3 | 40 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 4 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | End of term Classical Written Exam and Homework averages are reflected as 100% Final evaluation. | |
Information | Homeworks are given as scientific article researches and writings related to field education. |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Homeworks, Performances | 3 | 20 | 60 |
Projects | 1 | 28 | 28 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total WorkLoad | 180 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 6 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 6 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |