Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Serkan Gündüz Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Arkeoloji Bölümü, Sualtı Arkeolojisi ABD, 16240, Görükle/Nilüfer/BURSA sgunduz@uludag.edu.tr tel. 224 2942849 fax. 224 294 1677
18
Website:
19
Objective of the Course:
The aim of the course is to overview the outlines of the Trade in ancient times and the archaeological importance of amphorae in this context.
20
Contribution of the Course to Professional Development
Understanding the archaeological context of amphoras.
21
Learning Outcomes:
1
To be able to have knowledge about ancient trade routes.;
2
To be able to have knowledge about the trade goods in ancient times.;
3
To be able to have knowledge about the ancient amphora stamps;
4
To be able to have knowledge about the amphora typology. ;
5
To be able to analyse the trade relations between Anatolia and other regions in the light of amphorae. ;
22
Course Content:
Week
Theoretical
Practical
1
Description, Purpose, Content, Method and Bibliography of the Course
2
Trade in the Antiquity (trade partners of Mainland Greece and West Anatolia)
3
What are the functions of amphoras? Points to be considered in evaluating the amphora stamps
4
Points to be considered in typological evaluation of amphorae
5
The Great Greek Colonization and Emporions. Metropolis-Colony relationship and trade.
6
The Amphorae of Miletus and its colony Histria in the Archaic Period (An case study of Metropolis-colony relationship)
7
Phoenicians and the Mediterranean World
8
Amphora production in Greece.
9
Amphora production in the Aegean Islands
10
Amphora Production in Western Anatolia
11
Syrian-Palestinian Amphorae
12
Black Sea Amphorae
13
Amphorae from the shipwrecks and what they are telling us.
14
Amphoras uncovered in Ephesos and trade relations of Ephesos.
23
Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials:
A.K. Şenol, Marmaris Müzesi Ticari Amphoralari (2003) C. G. Starr, Antik Çağda Deniz Gücü (2000) E. Doğer, Antik Çağ’da Amphoralar (1991) G. F. Bass, Sualtında Arkeoloji (2003) L. Casson, Antik Çağda Denizcilik ve Gemiler (2002) Strabon, Antik Anadolu Coğrafyası (2005) Bezeczky et al. 2013 T. Bezecky, P. Scherrer – R. Sauer, The Amphorae of Roman Ephesus. Fie 15/1. Wien 2013. Bezeczky 2004 T. Bezeczky, “Early Roman Food Import in Ephesus: Amphorae from the Tetragonon Agora”. Eds. J. Eiring – J. Lund, Transport Amphorae and Trade in the Eastern Mediterrrannean (2004) 85- 98. Bezeczky 2005 T. Bezecky, “Late Roman Amphorae from the Tetragonos-Agora in Ephesus”. Ed. F. Krinzinger, Spätantike und Mittelalterliche Keramik aus Ephesus. DenkschrWien 332. Vienna (2005) 203–223.
24
Assesment
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES
NUMBER
PERCENT
Midterm Exam
0
0
Quiz
0
0
Homeworks, Performances
0
0
Final Exam
1
100
Total
1
100
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade
0
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade
100
Total
100
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course
The system of relative evaluation is applied.
Information
25
ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE
Activites
NUMBER
TIME [Hour]
Total WorkLoad [Hour]
Theoretical
14
2
28
Practicals/Labs
0
0
0
Self Study and Preparation
14
5
70
Homeworks, Performances
0
30
30
Projects
0
0
0
Field Studies
0
0
0
Midtermexams
0
0
0
Others
0
0
0
Final Exams
1
20
20
Total WorkLoad
148
Total workload/ 30 hr
4,93
ECTS Credit of the Course
5
26
CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS
