1 | Course Title: | LINGUISTICS TEXT ANALYSES |
2 | Course Code: | TDE6104 |
3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
4 | Level of Course: | Third Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 2 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 6 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | - |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. KERIME ÜSTÜNOVA |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Prof. Dr. Kerime ÜSTÜNOVA |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
E- Posta: ustunovak@yahoo.com Tel: 0 224 294 18 14 Adres: Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü E Blok Kat: 2 Oda Nu: 117 P.K.: 16059 Görükle / Nilüfer / Bursa / TÜRKİYE |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | To teach new orientations in linguistics; to pay attention to this requirement; to create a robust communications tool in order to transfer to next generation the linguistic; to teach new orientations in linguistics; to track road of world linguistics; to recognize scientists giving over linguistics; to provide language’s recognition with varieties roads as communication tool; to comprehend the working area of linguistics; to give general information about linguistics’ branches; to indicate mutual and different ways of linguistics with grammar |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | To learn the view of linguistics to the system called language; to comprehend a new method for text analysis. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Being the language is a system, the acts of language units in the system | |
2 | The largest language unit | |
3 | The ways of making connection between sentences | |
4 | The acts of the concept of surface structure-deep structure and ellipsis and deficiency for the text analysis | |
5 | Common time, common space and common people connections in the semantic relations between sentences | |
6 | Reason-result, question-answer and comparison connections in the semantic relations between sentences | |
7 | Opposition, abstract-concrete, all-part connections in the semantic relations between sentences | |
8 | Acts of the repetitions in the semantic relations between sentences | |
9 | Formation of the larger units than sentence | |
10 | Determination the bounds of the larger units than sentence | |
11 | Making semantic connection between the larger units than sentence | |
12 | Formation of the text | |
13 | Text analysis | |
14 | Text analysis |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Ahmet Kocaman, Sumru Özsoy, Kamile İmer; Dilbilim Sözlüğü, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2011. Berke Vardar; Açıklamalı Dilbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü, Multilingual Yabancı Dil Yayınları, İstanbul, 2007. Doğan Aksan; Anlambilim, Engin Yayın Evi, Ankara, 2009. Doğan Aksan; Her Yönüyle Dil Genel Çizgileriyle Dilbilim I-II-III, TDK Yayınları, Ankara, 2007. Engin Yılmaz; Türkiye Türkçesi Üzerine Araştırmalar, Pegem Akademi Yayınları, Ankara, 2010. Engin Yılmaz; Uygulamalı Metin Bilgisi, Pegem Akademi Yayınları, Ankara, 2010. Fatma Erkman Akerson; Dile Genel Bir Bakış, Multilingual Yabancı Dil Yayınları, İstanbul, 2008. Ferdinand de Sausssure (Çev.: Berke Vardar); Genel Dilbilim Dersleri, Multilingual Yabancı Dil Yayınları, İstanbul, 2001. Kerime Üstünova; Ad İşletimi, Kesit Yayınları, İstanbul, 2008. Kerime Üstünova; Dil Bilgisi Sorunları, Kesit Yayınları, İstanbul, 2010. Kerime Üstünova; Dil Yazıları, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara, 2011. Kerime Üstünova; Türkçede Yapı Kavramı ve Sözdizimi İncelemeleri, Uludağ Üniversitesi Yayınları, Bursa, 2002. M. Osman Toklu; Dilbilime Giriş, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara, 2003. N. Engin Uzun; Ana Çizgileriyle Evrensel Dilbilgisi ve Türkçe, Multilingual Yabancı Dil Yayınları, İstanbul, 2000. N. Engin Uzun; Biçimbilim (Temel Kavramlar), Papatya Yayıncılık Eğitim, İstanbul, 2006. Zeynel Kiran; Dilbilime Giriş, Seçkin Yayinlari, Ankara, 2001. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 100 |
Total | 1 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 0 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 100 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | The system of relative evaluation is applied. | |
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 10 | 4 | 40 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 70 | 70 |
Total WorkLoad | 180 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 6 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 6 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |