| 1 | Course Title: | COURSE BOOK EVALUATION IN FRENCH LANGUAGE TEACHING |
| 2 | Course Code: | FRN0003 |
| 3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
| 4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
| 5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
| 6 | Semester: | 3 |
| 7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
| 8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
| 9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 11 | Prerequisites: | Non |
| 12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
| 13 | Language: | Turkish |
| 14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| 15 | Course Coordinator: | Araş.Gör.Dr. DİLEK SOYLU BAŞTUĞ |
| 16 | Course Lecturers: | Arş.Gör. Dr. Dilek SOYLU BAŞTUĞ |
| 17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitimi Fakültesi Fransız Dili Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı Görükle / Bursa Tel: 02242942595 dilekbastug@uludag.edu.tr |
| 18 | Website: | |
| 19 | Objective of the Course: | The aim of this course is have knowledge of contextual and formal properties of course book and able to provide the appropriate course book according to student behaviour and class conditions. |
| 20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | What is the importance of the course book as a teachning tool? What are the formal and contextual properties that must be present in the course book? What is the relationship between student behaviour and course book? answers of these questions are course contents |
| 21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
| 22 | Course Content: |
| Week | Theoretical | Practical |
| 1 | Coursebook as teaching tool | |
| 2 | French education programmes and course books | |
| 3 | Presentation and comparison of FLT methods. | |
| 4 | Pictures in Turkish coursebooks | |
| 5 | Examining the pictures in French coursebooks in terms of sexism | |
| 6 | Readability and lexical properties of texts in French coursebook | |
| 7 | High level mental skills development competence of texts in French coursebooks | |
| 8 | Contemporary applications on measurement of language skills in French Coursebooks | |
| 9 | Different views about evaluation of French coursebooks-1 | |
| 10 | Different views about evaluation of French coursebooks-1 | |
| 11 | Readability and lexical properties of texts in French coursebooks | |
| 12 | Evaluation of French coursebooks. | |
| 13 | Evaluation of French coursebooks. | |
| 14 | Evaluation of French coursebooks. |
| 23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: | Bérard E:,1991. Approche communicative,Théories et Pratiques, Paris: Clé International. CECR, Le Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues : apprendre, enseigner, évaluer, texte intégral et volume complémentaire avec de nouveaux descripteurs. Strasbourg : Edition du Conseil de l’Europe (2001 et 2018). Seven S.,2008. Konu Alanı Ders Kitabı İncelemesi, Ankara: Pegem |
| 24 | Assesment |
| TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
| Midterm Exam | 1 | 20 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 20 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 3 | 100 |
| Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
| Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Short assignments, final exam | |
| Information | Norm-Referenced Evaluation | |
| 25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
| Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
| Theoretical | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Self Study and Preparation | 12 | 4 | 48 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midtermexams | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Others | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Final Exams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Total WorkLoad | 122 | ||
| Total workload/ 30 hr | 3,8 | ||
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
| 26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
| Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |