COURSE SYLLABUS

TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN EDUCATION

1	Course Title:	TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN EDUCATION
2	Course Code:	BIL5105
3	Type of Course:	Optional
4	Level of Course:	Second Cycle
5	Year of Study:	1
6	Semester:	1
7	ECTS Credits Allocated:	3
8	Theoretical (hour/week):	2
9	Practice (hour/week) :	0
10	Laboratory (hour/week) :	0
11	Prerequisites:
12	Recommended optional programme components:	None
13	Language:	Turkish
14	Mode of Delivery:	Face to face
15	Course Coordinator:	Doç. Dr. NURAY PARLAK YILMAZ
16	Course Lecturers:	Doç Dr. NURAY PARLAK YILMAZ
17	Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator:	e-posta: npyilmaz@gmail.com Tel: 29 42232 Adres: Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fak. Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü A Blok, Kat:3 Oda No: 311 Görükle Yerleşkesi 16059 Görükle/ BURSA
18	Website:
19	Objective of the Course:	The course focuses on to examine in all its parts the integration of technology in education
20	Contribution of the Course to Professional Development

Learning Outcomes:

1	Able to explain the concept of technological integration in education and other related concepts ;
2	Able to draw the main framework of the technological integration in education;
3	Able to explain interferences in terms of the technological integration in education ;
4	Able to explain the relationship between the technological integration in education and Technological Pedagogic Knowledge of subject (TPKS) ;
5	Able to evaluate the present cases of the technological integration in education in both Turkey and world ;

22	Course Content:

Week	Theoretical	Practical
1	Informing the students about the content, method and resources of the course.
2	Why is important the integration of technology in education?
3	Hew, K. F. & Brush, T. (2007).Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research.
4	Elgali, Z.& Kalman, Y.M. (2010). The Construction of Failure and Success Concepts in K- 12 ICT Integration. Interdisciplinary
5	Inan, F. A.&, Lowther, D. L.(2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use.
6	Lawless, K. A. & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers
7	Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use.
8	Parlak Yilmaz, N. (2012). Evaluation of the Technology Integration Process in the Turkish Education System.
9	Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at school in Europe 2011
10	Elgali, Z.& Kalman, Y.M. (2010). The Construction of Failure and Success Concepts in K-12 ICT Integration.
11	Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-Türkish literature
12	Haris, J. , Mishra, P.& Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed.
13	Presentation of literatural works
14	Presentation of literatural works

23	Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials:	Doering, A., Scharber, C., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2009). GeoThentic: Designing and Assessing With Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 316- 336. Elgali, Z.& Kalman, Y.M. (2010). The Construction of Failure and Success Concepts in K- 12 ICT Integration. Interdisciplinary. Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 2010 IJELLO special series of Chais Conference 2010 best papers, 281- 292. Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21-46. Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45. Haris, J. , Mishra, P.& Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education(JRTE), 41(4), 393–416. Hew, K. F. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Tech Research Dev, 55, 223–252, DOI 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5. Hofer, M., & Harris, J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers’ Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related Instructional Planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211- 229. Inan, F. A.&, Lowther, D. L.(2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 1– 8, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004. Koehler, M, & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J. Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. Lawless, K. A. & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, (4), 575–614. DOI: 10.3102/0034654307309921 Parlak Yilmaz, N. Evaluation of the Technology Integration Process in the Turkish Education System. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2 (1), 37- 54. So, H. J. & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.
24	Assesment

TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES	NUMBER	PERCENT
Midterm Exam	0	0
Quiz	0	0
Homeworks, Performances	11	70
Final Exam	1	30
Total	12	100
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade		70
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade		30
Total		100
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course
Information

ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE

Activites	NUMBER	TIME [Hour]	Total WorkLoad [Hour]
Theoretical	14	2	28
Practicals/Labs	0	0	0
Self Study and Preparation	10	9	90
Homeworks, Performances	11	0	0
Projects	1	20	20
Field Studies	0	0	0
Midtermexams	0	0	0
Others	0	0	0
Final Exams	1	12	12
Total WorkLoad			150
Total workload/ 30 hr			5
ECTS Credit of the Course			5

CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS

	PQ1	PQ2	PQ3	PQ5	PQ7
LO1	0	0	4	0	4
LO2	4	0	3	0	4
LO3	4	4	0	4	4
LO4	5	5	2	5	5
LO5	5	0	4	4	5

LO: Learning Objectives

PQ: Program Qualifications

Contribution Level:

1 Very Low

2 Low

3 Medium

4 High

5 Very High