1 | Course Title: | PORTFOLIO DESIGN |
2 | Course Code: | GRTS204 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | Short Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 4 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 3 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 1 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 2 |
11 | Prerequisites: | None |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Öğr.Gör. EVRİM SIRMALI ŞİRİN |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Yok |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | evrim@uludag.edu.tr |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | This course aims to make students prepare and present themselves and their work efficiently and professionally for work life before graduation. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | General information about the design of Portfolio | A student will collect own Works. |
2 | Information about the contents of Portfolio | A student selects the good ones from own Works. |
3 | Designing Portfolio | A student begins Portfolio of design sketches with a multimedia environment. |
4 | Evaluation of designs | Portfolio design is determined. |
5 | Be applied to the design’s model | Placement of the multimedia environment according to the format of the images |
6 | Evaluation and switch to the application of the models | The prototype portfolio is critical with respect |
7 | An overview of applying for a job they will be careful | The output of the experiment by taking control of color and string |
8 | An overview of applying for a job they will be careful | The output of the experiment by taking control of color and string |
9 | Strategies to cope with problems encountered in working life | Made the necessary arrangements multimedia environment |
10 | Portfolio will be evaluated to determine the contents of visual and written texts | Student writers curriculum vitae |
11 | To develop methods of coping with stress and creativity exercises | Multimedia environment according to the format determined by the font |
12 | Work order will be placed into the designated portfolio | Text and images are placed |
13 | Continuing to work order will be placed into the designated portfolio | Continuing text and images are placed |
14 | Portfolio will include the preparation of written documents | Last time I made the controls, the pressure is taken |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
•Kaptan, F., Korkmaz, H. (2000). Portfolio Assessment in Science Teaching: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, sayı:19 •Moya, S., O'Malley, M. (1994). A Portfolio Assessment Model for ESL: The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, v13 •Chapman, J. M., Pettway C. ve White, M. (2001). The portfolio: An instruction program assessment tool. Reference Services •Columba, L. ve Dolgos, K. A. (1995). Portfolio assessment in mathematics. Reading Improvement, 32(3), 174-176. •Dubrovich, M. (2002). A diversify your assesment portfolio. Principal, 82(2), 7-56. •Farr, R. (1990). Setting direction for language arts portfolios. Educational Leadership, 48(3), 103. •Fazal, M. ve Goldsby, D. (2001). Now that your student have created web-based digital portfolios, how do evaluate them? •Fenwick, T. J. ve Parsons, J. (1999). A note on using portfolios to assess learning. •Gearhart, M., Herman, J. L., Baker, E. L. ve Whittaker, A. K. (1993). A question for the validity of large-scale portfolio •142 A.Kan / H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 32 [2007] 133-144 •Koretz, D. (1994). The evolution of a portfolio program: The impact and quality of the vermont portfolio program. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 379301. •Krest, M. (1990). Adapting the portfolio to meet student needs. English Journal, 79(2), 29-34 •Moya, S., S.ve O’ Malley, M. (1994). A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Issues of Language Minority Students. 13(13), 13-36. •Owings, C. A. ve Follo, E. (1992). Effect of portfolio assessment on students attitudes and goal setting abilities in mathematics. Michigan. •Paulsaon, F.L., Paulson, P.R. ve Meyer, C.A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63. •Valencia, S. (1990). A portfolio approach to clasroom assessment: The whys, whats and hows. The Reading Teacher, 43(4), 338-40 •Wolfe, E. W. (1996). Student Reflection in Portfolio Assessment. ERIC Document Repreduction Service. ED 396004. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 2 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 3 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | ||
Information | A general overview of equipment for presentation, examinations on various presentation samples, presenting completed projects effectively, stylistic preferences regarding presentation, the definition of presentation and its significance, self-description, identification of portfolio target market, structure and technical preparation, decision about printing technique with regard to work that will be displayed, preparation of portfolio in printed or digital settings, designing autobiography, presentation of the work in a way that it will reflect the painter’s style professionally. |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 1 | 14 |
Practicals/Labs | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Self Study and Preparation | |||
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | ||
Projects | |||
Field Studies | |||
Midtermexams | 2 | ||
Others | |||
Final Exams | 1 | ||
Total WorkLoad | |||
Total workload/ 30 hr | |||
ECTS Credit of the Course |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |