Information Package & Course Catalogue
| 1 | Course Title: | COMPARATIVE LAW |
| 2 | Course Code: | HUK2016 |
| 3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
| 4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
| 5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
| 6 | Semester: | 4 |
| 7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
| 8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
| 9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 11 | Prerequisites: | YOK |
| 12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
| 13 | Language: | Turkish |
| 14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| 15 | Course Coordinator: | Dr. Ögr. Üyesi ZEYNEP ÖZGENÇ |
| 16 | Course Lecturers: | YOK |
| 17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | zeynepm@uludag.edu.tr |
| 18 | Website: | |
| 19 | Objective of the Course: | Learning different legal system and finding out the differences between these system and Turkish law will be examined. |
| 20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | It is aimed to see the deficiencies in Turkish Law and to propose solutions accordingly. |
| 21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
| 22 | Course Content: |
| Week | Theoretical | Practical |
| 1 | The concept of comparative law | |
| 2 | Relationship between comparative law and other legal system | |
| 3 | Purpose and function of comparative law | |
| 4 | Uniformation of law | |
| 5 | Comparative law method | |
| 6 | History of comparative law | |
| 7 | The French legal system | |
| 8 | The Latin legal system | |
| 9 | The German legal system | |
| 10 | The Swiss legal system | |
| 11 | The Turkish legal system | |
| 12 | The Anglo-American legal system | |
| 13 | The English legal system | |
| 14 | Legal system of Commonwealth |
| 23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: | Arzu OĞUZ, COMPARATIVE LAW, ANKARA, 2004. |
| 24 | Assesment |
| TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
| Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 2 | 100 |
| Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
| Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | It is aimed to evaluate court decisions with their ability to use the legislation freely. | |
| Information | It is aimed to improve students' reasoning. | |
| 25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
| Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
| Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Self Study and Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midtermexams | 1 | 46 | 46 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exams | 1 | 46 | 46 |
| Total WorkLoad | 120 | ||
| Total workload/ 30 hr | 4 | ||
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
| 26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
| Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |