| 1 | Course Title: | WRITINGS OF ART |
| 2 | Course Code: | GSR2014 |
| 3 | Type of Course: | Compulsory |
| 4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
| 5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
| 6 | Semester: | 4 |
| 7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 3 |
| 8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
| 9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
| 11 | Prerequisites: | - |
| 12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
| 13 | Language: | Turkish |
| 14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
| 15 | Course Coordinator: | Öğr.Gör. Gülser AKTAN |
| 16 | Course Lecturers: | - |
| 17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
evrim@uludag.edu.tr 0 224 2940895 Uludağ Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Resim Bölümü, Görükle Kampüsü / BURSA |
| 18 | Website: | |
| 19 | Objective of the Course: | This course is designed to perform students independent verbal research and write source-based essays about art. Students respond directly to art as seen in their textbooks, and interpret their thoughts into writing using the terminology of art. |
| 20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development |
| 21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
| 22 | Course Content: |
| Week | Theoretical | Practical |
| 1 | Scientific research methods. (methods of data collection, footnotes, quotations, etc..)Determination of the books to be read until the mid-term exam. | |
| 2 | Rules of Scientific text writing. (Writing title, introduction, development, conclusion parts and references in thesis,text of artwork, essays and articles), Determination of the books to be read until the mid-term exam. | |
| 3 | Methods of art criticism; 1. Classical Art Criticism. (Identification, Analysis, Interpretation, Judgment) Criticism Examples from Classical Art. Analysis report of art writing which read from the selected book. | |
| 4 | Classical Art Criticism. (Identification, Analysis, Interpretation,Judgment) Criticism Examples from Classical Art. Analysis report of art writing wich read from the selected book. | |
| 5 | 2. Contemporary art criticism. (Technical review, the psychological review, aesthetic review, sociological review, philosophical review) Criticism Examples from Classical Art. Analysis report of art writing wich read from the selected book. | |
| 6 | Contemporary art criticism. (Technical review, the psychological review, aesthetic review, sociological review, philosophical review) Criticism Examples from Classical Art. Analysis report of art writing wich read from the selected book. | |
| 7 | Repeating courses and midterm exam | |
| 8 | Writing an article about the art of works using the methods of art criticism and rules of scientific writing. | |
| 9 | Writing an article about the concept by using the methods and rules of scientific writing. | |
| 10 | Writing an article about different art disciplines by using the methods and rules of scientific writing. | |
| 11 | Writing an article about the contemporary art practices by using rules of scientific writing and methods of art criticism. | |
| 12 | Writing an article about an exhibition by using rules of scientific writing and methods of art criticism. | |
| 13 | Writing an essay to be associated with contemporary concept and art. | |
| 14 | Written defense of his/her own work.by using rules of scientific writing and methods of art criticism. |
| 23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
•Ersoy, Ayla; Sanat Eleştirisi, Artes Yayınları, İstanbul, 2010 •Güvemli, Zahir, Güzel ve Sanat, Türkiye Yayınevi,1970 •Bozkurt, Nejat, Sanat ve Estetik Kuramları, Asa Kitapevi, 2000 •Berger, John, Görme Biçimleri, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, 2007 •Gombrich, E.H., Sanatın Öyküsü, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1999 •Klee, Paul, Çağdaş Sanat Kuramı, Dost Yayınları, Ankara, 1986 •Lukacs, Georg, Çağdaş Gerçekçiliğin Anlamı, Payel Yayınları •Turani, Adnan, Çağdaş Sanat Felsefesi, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1999 •Tanyeli, Uğur ve Sözen, Metin, Sanat Kavram ve Terimleri Sözlüğü, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1999 •Bigalı, Şeref, Resim Sanatı, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Ankara, 1999 •Poore, H. Rankin, Pictorial Composition and the Critical Judgment of Pictures, Echo Library, 2009 •Alsberg, John. Modern Art and Its Enigma: Art Theories from 1800 to 1950 Based Upon the Writings of This Period's Artists and Philosophers, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1983. •Barasch, Moshe, Modern Theories of Art, New York University Press, New York, 1990-1998. •Kocur, Zoya and Simon Leung, Theory in Contemporary Art Since 1985, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005. •Barnet, Sylvan, A Short Guide to Writing About Art. 8th ed. ,Longman New York, 2005 •Seyidoğlu, Halil; “Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yazma Yöntemi”, Kurtiş Matbası, 9. Basım, İstanbul 2003 •Rifat, Mehmet; “XX. Yüzyılda Dilbilim ve Göstergebilim Kuramları” 1. Tarih ve Eleştirel Düşünceler, Y.K.Y., 3. Baskı, İstanbul 2005. •Rifat, Mehmet; “XX. Yüzyılda Dilbilim ve Göstergebilim Kuramları” 2. Temel Metinler, Y.K.Y., 3. Baskı, İstanbul 2005 |
| 24 | Assesment |
| TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
| Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 2 | 100 |
| Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
| Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
| Total | 100 | |
| Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | ||
| Information | ||
| 25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
| Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
| Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Self Study and Preparation | 10 | 5 | 50 |
| Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midtermexams | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exams | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Total WorkLoad | 95 | ||
| Total workload/ 30 hr | 3 | ||
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 3 |
| 26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
| Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |