1 | Course Title: | THE PROBLEM OF BEING IN OUR AGE |
2 | Course Code: | FEL5114 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | Second Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 2 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | No |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. ABDÜLKADIR ÇÜÇEN |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Prof. Dr. A. Kadir ÇÜÇEN, Doç. Dr. Ogün ÜREK, Yard. Doç. Dr. Metin Mecermen |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
Kadir@uludag.edu.tr; Uludağ Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, 16059 Görükle, Bursa - Türkiye. Tel: +90 224 2941826 |
18 | Website: | http://felsefe.uludag.edu.tr/site/node/153 |
19 | Objective of the Course: | First of all, the aim of this course is to establish a framework by reasoning upon being with the help of some basic concepts. Then some contemporary philosophers who tried to solve the problem of being are going to be analyzed within this framework. And at last, the problem of being is going to be evaluate in a historical context. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Introduction to the topic of being | |
2 | Explaining the concepts which are related with being. | |
3 | Explaining the problem of being in modern philosophy. | |
4 | Explaining the notion of being in 19. yy. century, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche | |
5 | Explaining Hartmann’s understanding of Being I | |
6 | Explaining Hartmann’s understanding of Being II | |
7 | Explaining Heidegger’s understanding of Being I | |
8 | Explaining Heidegger’s understanding of Being II | |
9 | Explaining Heidegger’s understanding of Being III | |
10 | Explaining Heidegger’s understanding of Being IV | |
11 | Explaining Heidegger’s understanding of Being V | |
12 | Explaining Sartre’’s understanding of Being I | |
13 | Explaining Sartre’’s understanding of Being II | |
14 | General evaluation or comments |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Çüçen, Kadir. Varlık Felsefesi, Ezgi Kitabevi, Bursa 2010. Çüçen, A. Kadir Çüçen, Martin Heidegger: Varlık ve Zaman, Sentez Yayıncılık, Bursa, 2012. Cevizci, Ahmet, Metafiziğe Giriş, Paradigma Yayınları, İstanbul, 2001. Platon, Diyaloglar I ve II, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul 1993. Martin Heidegger, Varlık ve Zaman, çev. Aziz Yardımlı, İdea Yayınları, İstanbul Martin Heidegger, Metafizik Nedir? Çev. Yusuf Örnek, TFK Yayınları, 2009. Sartre, Varlık ve Hiçlik, çev. Gaye Eksen ve Turhan Ilgaz, İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul 2011. Nicolai Hartmann, Ontolojide Yeni Yollar, Çev. Lütfi Yarbaş, İlya Yayınları, İzmir. Işık Eren, 20. yy’da Felsefe: Karşı Çıkışlar ve Yeni Arayışlar, Asa Kitabevi, Bursa, 2005. Heidegger, Martin, Nietzsche’nin Tanrı Öldü Sözü”, Asa Kitabevi, Bursa. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 30 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 5 | 20 |
Final Exam | 1 | 50 |
Total | 7 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 50 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 50 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | ||
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 10 | 2 | 20 |
Homeworks, Performances | 5 | 7 | 35 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Others | 5 | 7 | 35 |
Final Exams | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total WorkLoad | 148 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 4,93 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 5 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |