1 | Course Title: | EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS |
2 | Course Code: | ÖZE2315 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 3 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 3 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | None |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Öğr. Gör. Dr. OYA ARSLAN ARMUTCU |
16 | Course Lecturers: | yok |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | oyaarslanarmutcu@gmail.com |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | At the end of this course, students can define language, speech and communication concepts, components and sub-components of language, explain phonological, morphological and syntax development in children, measure vocal development, list morphological developmental stages, calculate average utterance length, list semantic development categories, explain vocabulary acquisition. They can discuss hypotheses and prepare an assessment plan for language components. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | To gain the necessary knowledge and skills to evaluate and support the language and communication skills of individuals with special needs. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | Language, speech and communication concepts | |
2 | prelinguistic communşcation skills | |
3 | Format component and its subcomponents | |
4 | Phonology, morphology and syntax development in children with special needs | |
5 | Preparing an assessment plan to measure the form development stages | |
6 | Content component and its subcomponents | |
7 | Content component and its subcomponents | |
8 | Hypotheses explaining vocabulary acquisition | |
9 | Preparing an assessment plan to measure the stages of meaning development | |
10 | Usage component and subcomponents | |
11 | Usage component and subcomponents | |
12 | language acquisition | |
13 | Calculation of average utterance length | |
14 | Discuss the results of the assessment plan for the language components |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Abbeduto, L., Warren, S. F., & Conners, F. A. (2007). Language development in down syndrome: from the prelinguistic period to the acquisition of literacy. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(3), 247-261. Adamson, L. B., & Chance, S. E. (1998). Coordinating attention to people, objects and language. A. M. Wetherby, S. F. Warren, & J. Reichle (Ed.), Transitions in prelinguistic communication içinde (15-38). Baltimore: Brookes. Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother–infant and peer–infant interaction. Child Development, 55(4), 1278-1289. Barton, E. E., Chen C. I., Pribble, L., Pomes, M., & Kim,Y. A. (2013). Coaching preservice teachers to teach play skills to children with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(4), 330 -349. Bates, E., O’Connell, B., & Shore, C. (1987). Language and communication in infancy. J. Osofsky (Ed.). In Handbook of infant development (149-203). Newyork: John Wiley&Sons. Gazdag, G. A., & Warren, S. F. (2000). Effects of adult contingent imititation on development of young children’s vocal imititation. Journal Of Early Intervention, 23, 24-35 Kaiser, A. P., Hancock, T. B., & Nietfeld, J. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced Milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Journal of Early Education and Development, 11(4),423-446. Kaiser, A. P., Hemmeter, M. L., Ostrosky, M. M., Alpert, C. L., & Hancock, T. B. (1995). The effects of group training and individual feedback on parent use of milieu teaching. Journal of Child Communication Disorders, 16(2), 39-48. Mahoney, G., Boyce, G., Fewell, R. R., Spiker, D., & Wheeden, C. A. (1998). The relationship of parent-child interaction to the effectiveness of early intervention services for at-risk children and children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18(1), 5-17. Warren, S.F. (1991). Enhancing communication and language development with milieu teaching procedures. E. Cipani (Ed.), A guide for developing language competence in preschool children with severe and moderate handicaps içinde (68-93). Springfield, IL: Th Warren, S. F., Bredin-Oja, S. L., Escalente, M. F., Finestack, L. H., Fey, M. E., & Brady, N. C. (2006). Responsivity education/ prelinguistic milieu teaching. R. McCauley & M. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children içinde (47-75). Baltimore, MD: Brookes. Warren, S. F., Yoder, P. J., Gazdag, G. E., Kim, K., & Jones, H. A. (1993). Facilitating prelinguistic communication skills in young children with developmental delay. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 36(1), 83-97. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 40 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 2 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Quiz,Ödev, Proje, | |
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 9 | 8 | 72 |
Homeworks, Performances | 0 | 6 | 18 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total WorkLoad | 120 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 4 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |