COURSE SYLLABUS
FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS OF EPISTEMOLOGY
1 |
Course Title: |
FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS OF EPISTEMOLOGY |
2 |
Course Code: |
FDB5123 |
3 |
Type of Course: |
Optional |
4 |
Level of Course: |
Second Cycle |
5 |
Year of Study: |
1 |
6 |
Semester: |
1 |
7 |
ECTS Credits Allocated: |
8 |
8 |
Theoretical (hour/week): |
3 |
9 |
Practice (hour/week) : |
0 |
10 |
Laboratory (hour/week) : |
0 |
11 |
Prerequisites: |
|
12 |
Recommended optional programme components: |
None |
13 |
Language: |
Turkish |
14 |
Mode of Delivery: |
Face to face |
15 |
Course Coordinator: |
Prof. Dr. İSMAİL ÇETİN |
16 |
Course Lecturers: |
|
17 |
Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
ismcet@uludag.edu.tr 0224 2431066/60322 |
18 |
Website: |
|
19 |
Objective of the Course: |
Obtaining main problems in the theory of knowledge their explanations. |
20 |
Contribution of the Course to Professional Development |
Gain analytical thinking and problem solving skills |
21 |
Learning Outcomes: |
1 |
PROBLEMS AND AIM OF EPISTEMOLOGY;
|
2 |
DEFINITION AND KINDS OF KNOWLEDGE;
|
3 |
DISCUSSION OF PHILOSOPHERS ABOUT THE SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE;
|
4 |
EMPRICIST PHILOSOPHERS IN ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY;
|
5 |
EMPRICIST PHILOSOPHERS IN ENLIGHTENMANT;
|
6 |
EMPRICISM IN LOCKE, BERKELEY AND HUME;
|
7 |
RATIONALIST THEMES IN PLATON’S DOCTRINE OF IDEAS;
|
8 |
CARTESIAN RATIONALISM;
|
9 |
RECONCILIATION OF EMPRICISM AND RATIONALISM IN KANT’S PHILOSOPHY;
|
10 |
DISCUSSION ABOUT THE VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE;
|
|
Week |
Theoretical |
Practical |
1 |
PROBLEMS AND AIM OF EPISTEMOLOGY |
|
2 |
DEFINITION AND KINDS OF KNOWLEDGE |
|
3 |
DISCUSSION OF PHILOSOPHERS ABOUT THE SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE |
|
4 |
EXPLANATIONS OF EMPRICISM ABOUT THE SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE |
|
5 |
EMPRICIST PHILOSOPHERS IN ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY |
|
6 |
EMPRICIST PHILOSOPHERS IN ENLIGHTENMANT |
|
7 |
EMPRICISM IN LOCKE, BERKELEY AND HUME |
|
8 |
EXPLANATIONS OF RATIONALISM ABOUT THE SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE |
|
9 |
RATIONALIST THEMES IN PLATON’S DOCTRINE OF IDEAS |
|
10 |
CARTESIAN RATIONALISM |
|
11 |
RECONCILIATION OF EMPRICISM AND RATIONALISM IN KANT’S PHILOSOPHY |
|
12 |
DISCUSSION ABOUT THE VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE |
|
13 |
SCEPTIC PHILOSOPHERS |
|
14 |
ANSWER OF DOGMATISM TO SCEPTICISM |
|
23 |
Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
HAMLYN, D.W., THE THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE, MACMILLAN COMP., LONDON 1972. ÜLKEN, H. Z., GENEL FELSEFE DERSLERI, ANK. ÜİF. YAY., ANKARA 1971 |
24 |
Assesment |
|
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES |
NUMBER |
PERCENT |
Midterm Exam |
0 |
0 |
Quiz |
0 |
0 |
Homeworks, Performances |
0 |
0 |
Final Exam |
1 |
100 |
Total |
1 |
100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade |
0 |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade |
100 |
Total |
100 |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course |
Open-ended evaluation method will be applied. |
Information |
|
25 |
|
ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites |
NUMBER |
TIME [Hour] |
Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical |
14 |
3 |
42 |
Practicals/Labs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Self Study and Preparation |
14 |
7 |
98 |
Homeworks, Performances |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Projects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Field Studies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Midtermexams |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Exams |
1 |
100 |
100 |
Total WorkLoad |
|
|
240 |
Total workload/ 30 hr |
|
|
8 |
ECTS Credit of the Course |
|
|
8 |
26 |
CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS |
|
PQ1
|
PQ2
|
PQ3
|
PQ4
|
PQ5
|
PQ6
|
PQ7
|
PQ8
|
PQ9
|
PQ10
|
PQ11
|
LO1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
LO2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
LO3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
LO4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
LO5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
LO6
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
LO7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
LO8
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
LO9
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
LO10
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
LO: Learning Objectives |
PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: |
1 Very Low |
2 Low |
3 Medium |
4 High |
5 Very High |