1 | Course Title: | SOCIAL IMPACT MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT |
2 | Course Code: | ISL5120 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | Second Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 1 |
6 | Semester: | 2 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | - |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. BİLÇİN MEYDAN |
16 | Course Lecturers: | Prof. Dr. Bilçin MEYDAN |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: | Prof. Dr. Bilçin MEYDAN |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | The profit maximization focus of the companies is needed to be integrated with socially responsible behavior. Thus, this course aims to teach student how social impacts of the companies can be measured and improved along with the financial results. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development | Traditional apporach to business management focuses on shareholder value. Controversially, there was a shift in related literature and business practices frm shareholder value to stakeholder interests. Thus, teaching students stakeholder management approach is vital for the students to get more employment opportunities. |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | The relationship between modern management philosophy, ethics, social responsibility and business globalization, | |
2 | Ethics and business ethics - the conceptual framework | |
3 | Approaches to Ethics | |
4 | Analysis of reasons that lead organizations to ethical behavior | |
5 | The conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility 1 | |
6 | The conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility 2 | |
7 | Definition and management of stakeholders | |
8 | The basis of analysis of the ethical and social responsibilities of stakeholder groups | |
9 | Relationship between ethics and business functions 1 | |
10 | Relationship between ethics and business functions 2 | |
11 | Ethical decision-making in business models and the factors affecting | |
12 | Case study 1 | |
13 | Case study 2 | |
14 | Discussion about the results of emprical studies |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
Archie B CARROLL, Business & Society, Ethics and Stakeholder Management, South-western Publishing, second edition, 1993 William C FREDERICK, Keith DAVIS, James POST, Business and Society, Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics, Sixth edition, Mc Graw Hill, 1988. MARCUS, Alfred; Business And Society, Strategy, Ethics, And The Global Economy, Chicago: Irwın Publishing, 1996. Joseph W. WEISS, Business Ethics, International Thomson Publishing, 1994 John R BOATRIGHT, Ethics and the Conduct of Business, Prentice Hall, 1997 |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 30 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 30 |
Final Exam | 1 | 40 |
Total | 3 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 60 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 40 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | Literature knowledge is measured in Midterm Exam. Final exam aims to asses students' case analysis competencies. Group project is used as an assesment tool for measuring students' teamwork skills and understandings about real business practices. | |
Information | In this course, a triple assesmant model is used. |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Others | 1 | 25 | 25 |
Final Exams | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Total WorkLoad | 125 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 4,17 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |