1 | Course Title: | MISCONCEPTS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION |
2 | Course Code: | FEN0003 |
3 | Type of Course: | Optional |
4 | Level of Course: | First Cycle |
5 | Year of Study: | 2 |
6 | Semester: | 3 |
7 | ECTS Credits Allocated: | 4 |
8 | Theoretical (hour/week): | 2 |
9 | Practice (hour/week) : | 0 |
10 | Laboratory (hour/week) : | 0 |
11 | Prerequisites: | |
12 | Recommended optional programme components: | None |
13 | Language: | Turkish |
14 | Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
15 | Course Coordinator: | Doç. Dr. NERMİN BULUNUZ |
16 | Course Lecturers: | |
17 | Contactinformation of the Course Coordinator: |
Doç. Dr. Nermin Bulunuz. Eğitim Fakültesi, E Blok, No:237. Görükle Bura. Dahili Tel. 42238 |
18 | Website: | |
19 | Objective of the Course: | The objectives of this lesson are: 1. What is misconception to prospective teachers who will be science teachers; 2. What are the negative effects on students' cognitive development; 3. What are the most common misconceptions of students in Science classes; 4. What are the conceptual change methods that can be used in the classroom to eliminate these errors; 5. How conceptual change methods can be used by Science teachers in lessons; 6. To teach a science teacher what methods he can use to detect misconceptions in his students and 7. To give examples of domestic and foreign research on this subject. |
20 | Contribution of the Course to Professional Development |
21 | Learning Outcomes: |
|
22 | Course Content: |
Week | Theoretical | Practical |
1 | First Meeting. Introducing the course and giving information about the course content. | |
2 | What is concept? How do we learn concepts? (Piaget, Vygotsky, & Kuhn) Conceptual change thoery. | |
3 | What is misconception? What are the reasons of misconceptions? What are the negative effects of misconceptions on students? | |
4 | Examination of the most common misconception examples at different grade levels in the Science program by giving examples from the researches in this field. | |
5 | Methods of detecting misconceptions: • Prediction-Observation-Description (TGA, TAGA), What I know, What I want to learn, What I learned | |
6 | Methods of detecting misconceptions: • Formative probe questions, • Examining examples of formative assessment probes prepared at different grade levels. | |
7 | Misconceptions Methods to overcome misconceptions: Learning stations | |
8 | Misconceptions Methods to overcome misconceptions: Learning stations Examination of article samples written about learning stations. • Concept maps, -What is it used for? -How to draw? How is it evaluated? | |
9 | Methods for clearing misconceptions: Concept cartoons, | |
10 | Methods for clearing misconceptions: • Conceptual change texts (KDM), one of the methods to overcome misconceptions. • Examining (KDM) examples and reminding how they are used in the KDM classroom environment. | |
11 | 88/5000 Methods for clearing misconceptions: Analogies, Semantic Analysis Tables (ACT) | |
12 | 62/5000 Methods for clearing misconceptions: Concept Networks (KA) | |
13 | 113/5000 Examination of research examples in which methods of eliminating misconceptions are used through articles. | |
14 | General evaluation of the semester & Getting students' feedback about the course. |
23 | Textbooks, References and/or Other Materials: |
1. Bulunuz, N. (2006). Understanding of Earth and Space Science Concepts: Strategies for Concept Building in Elementary Teacher Preperation. Doktora Tezi, Georgia State Universitesi, Atlanta,USA. 2. Gödek, Y., Polat, D., & Kaya, V.H. (2018). Fen Bilgisi öğretiminde Kavram Yanılgıları: Kavram yanılgılarının tespiti-Giderilmesi ve Uygulamalı örnekler. Pegem Akademi, Ankara. 3. Ülgen, G. (2004). Kavram Geliştirme, Kuramlar ve Uygulamalar, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara. 4. Kuhn ,T. (1970). Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı. |
24 | Assesment |
TERM LEARNING ACTIVITIES | NUMBER | PERCENT |
Midterm Exam | 1 | 30 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 10 |
Final Exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 3 | 100 |
Contribution of Term (Year) Learning Activities to Success Grade | 40 | |
Contribution of Final Exam to Success Grade | 60 | |
Total | 100 | |
Measurement and Evaluation Techniques Used in the Course | ||
Information |
25 | ECTS / WORK LOAD TABLE |
Activites | NUMBER | TIME [Hour] | Total WorkLoad [Hour] |
Theoretical | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Practicals/Labs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Self Study and Preparation | 5 | 10 | 50 |
Homeworks, Performances | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Projects | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Studies | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midtermexams | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exams | 1 | 15 | 15 |
Total WorkLoad | 113 | ||
Total workload/ 30 hr | 3,77 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 4 |
26 | CONTRIBUTION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO PROGRAMME QUALIFICATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO: Learning Objectives | PQ: Program Qualifications |
Contribution Level: | 1 Very Low | 2 Low | 3 Medium | 4 High | 5 Very High |